NAVSPECWARCOM - New assets,
changing roles and missions
|
 |
Special Warfare
Combatant-craft Crewmen (SWCC)
candidates from Crewman
Qualification Training (CQT) Class
61 ride a rigid-hull inflatable boat
to the Southern California offshore
naval gunnery range for a training
exercise on March 18, 2009. CQT is a
14-week course that teaches Special
Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen
candidates the skills they need as
members of the Naval Special Warfare
boat teams. Candidates learn
navigation, craft maintenance and
repair, towing, anchoring, and
weapons. U.S. Navy photo by Mass
Communication Specialist 2nd Class
Arcenio Gonzalez Jr.
|
|
Established in October 2002, Naval
Special Warfare Group-4 (NSWG-4) is tasked to
organize, equip, and train Special Warfare
Combatant-craft Crewmen at subordinate Special Boat
Teams to support Naval Special Warfare (NSW)
activities around the world.
NSWG-4 is responsible for the
development and testing of combatant craft and
associated equipment as well as the development and
evaluation of operational doctrine, tactics, and
procedures for employment of those assets. The
group’s broad global responsibilities are supported
by several models of specialized NSW surface craft.
“When we think of our surface
craft, we have what we call ‘the iron triangle of
range, speed, and payload,’” explained Capt. Todd
Veazie, commander of
NSWG-4. “And any craft has range, speed, and
payload. That describes a boat.”
Veazie then outlined recent
activities and the current state of the NSW surface
craft fleet, as well as some of the ongoing
evolution in professional development programs and
possible future changes to support the nation in a
dynamic global environment.
11-meter NSW RIB
“Our most ‘utilitarian’ craft is our smallest craft:
our
11-Meter NSW RIB – rigid-hull inflatable boat,”
Veazie began. “This has been a workhorse for us for
the 15 to 18 years that it has been in service with
us. It is deployable from an aircraft under
parachutes with the guys then jumping in on top of
it. That capability extends the operational reach of
our operational commanders forward: the warfighters.
So it’s been a great craft that we use for a range
of missions; including ship-to-shore movement of
clandestine forces, as part of an overt insertion of
SOF forces, for maritime interdiction operations,
and for an entire range of maritime special
operations.
“It’s utilitarian in the sense
that it’s easy to traffic or transport,” he said.
“It fits on a C-130. It’s air dropable. It’s easily
trailored. It’s easy to get in and out of water.
It’s easily trafficked across improved roads and
under bridges. It can also be moved over largely
unimproved roads into austere operational
environments where the nation asks us to go. And, by
and large, it’s still a pretty big craft.
“So it’s been a great craft that
we’ve used for lots and lots of missions over the
years, most prominently were the sanction violation
enforcement operations that we did – for about 12
years between the First Gulf War and Operation Iraqi
Freedom – in the northern end of the Persian Gulf
against Saddam Hussein,” he offered. “The guys were
up there and did hundreds and hundreds of boardings
against smuggling of products, principally illicit
oil shipments out of Iraq but also dates and all
kinds of other commodities that were giving Saddam
lifelines of cash. |
 |
A Naval Special Warfare 11-meter,
rigid-hull inflatable boat assigned to Special Boat
Team 20 is launched from an Air Force C-17
Globemaster III during a maritime craft aerial
deployment system exercise off Virginia Beach, Va.
U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist
Chief Kathryn Whittenberger |
|
“But that craft is reaching the end
of its service life,” he said. “And we’re looking to
replace it. We call the replacement Combatant Craft,
Medium [CCM]. We have a request for proposals [RFP]
out to industry. They are coming back with their
proposals right now and it is in the source
selection process.”
Clarifying that he is not part of that source
selection process, Veazie observed, “I can, however,
tell you what we have asked industry to build for
us. We are trying to give them as much ‘trade space’
as we can with this craft.
“Looking back at the NSW RIB, in
some of the mission sets that it was asked to go
into – non-permissive and even leaning into denied
environments – it is now becoming more and more
technically obsolete because of the migration or
evolution of early warning detection systems that
our potential adversaries are now able to obtain,”
he explained. “The NSW RIB has no signature
reduction or signature management built into it, so
it’s pretty easy to find, either visually or with
not too sophisticated radars and early warning
systems. We believe we need to give our operators a
little bit more than that. So, in our next
generation of craft, we are looking at some sort of
signature management.
“The other thing we have learned
is that the boats really beat the heck out of our
guys,” he continued. “The maritime environment is
incredibly harsh and it doesn’t take much sea state
before the guys are really getting banged up in the
boats. And, of course, the craft themselves take a
lot of beating as well. That can affect the mission.
It certainly affects the musculoskeletal system of
these operators over a career. This is a closed-loop
community where our Special Warfare Combatant-craft
Crewmen do this for up to 30 years. So over that
career they pull a lot of Gs and absorb tremendous
shocks. We are learning a lot about those types of
stresses and are going to try to extend that
understanding to industry. So as we look at these
new craft, we are trying to build, from the keel up,
characteristics that will provide shock mitigation
and other properties that are going to take better
care of our most precious commodity – our people.
“We’ve also had a migration in our
C4I [command, control, communications, computers,
and intelligence] systems and our ability to
communicate and have situational awareness of what
is going on around us,” he said.
Veazie noted that trying to put
all of those different attributes into a C-130
transportable craft is a significant challenge.
“So we have tried to give industry
some trade space, offering, ‘What if we made it C-17
transportable?’ That opens up more space to get
better range, speed, and payload, a bigger engine,
more space for guys and gear, better shock
mitigation, and all these other things. So that’s
what we’ve done. The new requirement is a C-17
transportable craft that will no longer be required
to be air deployable. We’re waiting to see what
comes back and I’m really excited about it,” he
said.
Mk. V Special Operations
Craft
Moving up the surface craft size spectrum, Veazie
pointed to the Mk. V Special Operations Craft as
“another workhorse that has been in the inventory
for about the same length of time as the NSW RIB.
And it’s also coming to the end of its service
life.”
“Right now we see it deployed in
places like the Pacific Theater,” he noted. “A craft
with this kind of range, speed, and payload allows
the warfighter and the commander out there to move
those craft around and move forces around, whether
they are our forces or forces from a partner nation,
within the rules of engagement.
“But, in comparison to the NSW
RIB, this one is tougher to move around,” he
acknowledged. “Those transportability features are
not as present as with the smaller craft. Also, as
with the NSW RIB, the Mk. V lacks integral signature
reduction design or technologies, making it
increasingly obsolete against some of the technical
threat environments it might face.”
The possible replacement for the
Mk. V is being called Combatant Craft Heavy (CCH).
|
 |
Special Warfare Combatant-craft
Crewman (SWCC) assigned to Special Boat Team (SBT)
20 aboard a Mk. V Special Operations Craft. SWCC
operate and maintain the Navy's inventory of
state-of-the-art, high-speed boats in support of
special operations missions worldwide. U.S. Navy
photo by Mass Communication Specialist Chief Kathryn
Whittenberger |
In a
resource-constrained environment
where we have been fighting two land
wars for the last 10 years, the
priorities have been elsewhere, not
necessarily focused on a maritime
environment,” Veazie noted. “So we
have taken the guidance that comes
from the highest reaches of our
government and OSD [Office of the
Secretary of Defense], looking to
partner with our Navy on the concept
of a ‘common seaframe.’ This would
be a little bit like what we do with
the Army special operations on
common helicopters and with the Air
Force, where we get a slick C-130
suitable for the general purpose Air
Force and make modifications that
makes it more SOF-peculiar. It would
be the same with the common seaframe.
It may have different intelligence
or communications systems. It may
have different signature management.
It may have other modifications that
allow it to be more suitable to our
needs, while the fleet will have
more value in their version of the
craft.“We
haven’t finished defining the
requirement for this yet so there is
still work ahead,” he cautioned.
“But we are working it with the Navy
and it has been discussed at the
four-star level between U.S. Special
Operations Command and our Navy.”
Afloat
Forward Staging Base
“Finally, in the larger sense, we
need afloat forward staging. Our
Afloat Forward Staging Base allows
us to have sort of ‘sovereignty of
U.S. soil,’ if you will – a
U.S.-leased or -chartered vessel –
that allows us to mother or stage a
force that includes boats,
potentially helicopters, and the
SEAL operators and Special Warfare
Combatant Crewmen that drive the
boats. And it allows us to move that
vessel and that operational package
to any coastline around the world.
Again, that allows us to extend our
operational reach,” he said.
“We have a couple
of these that we call Maritime
Support Vessels [MSV]. And typically
what we have been using are craft
that we have been leasing to give us
that persistence that, frankly, we
don’t get from the fleet. Now let me
emphasize that’s not because the
fleet doesn’t want to. But to remain
for months or possibly six or seven
years off a particular operational
area is very tough for them. They
are very agile. They are moving
around. They have engagements to do.
They have places to go. So they
can’t give us that kind of
persistence that we have by ‘owning
our own craft,’ if you will. This
allows for that persistence,” he
said.
“The craft that
service offshore oil rigs have
proven to be a pretty good platform
to give us that persistence,” he
noted. “And the companies that we
lease these from allow us to make
some modifications to the hoists and
cranes on them. We put our own
communications package on them. And
there are also intelligence suites
that can be plugged and played into
these craft to give us that
situational awareness that allows us
to direct our operations, actions,
and activities in that maritime
special operations environment.”
In terms of the
future, he offered, “We will see
what happens with our afloat force
staging. We have always looked to
our amphibious Navy to provide that
force and we have certainly seen
that off the Somali basin against
the pirates, where we have gotten
great support from our fleet. But we
need to do better about that. Again,
that persistence is a key thing we
look for and these MSVs are perhaps
the answer to that. There is nothing
particularly sophisticated about
them but that may be part of the
future.
“Right now we have
one MSV leased out in the Pacific,
where it is providing our persistent
presence there. All of our other
forces around the world are land
based, with the boats deploying
around the theater from aircraft or
other shipping,” he said.
Changing
Roles and Missions
Asked about the realities of
changing roles and missions over the
last few years, Veazie offered, “Our
principal reason to have these craft
is to move special operators or
special equipment into designated
missions. But I think the real
change to me over the years, and
this is for all of special
operations, is that when I was
growing up in this community, we
would be tasked to do kind of
discrete missions that were SOF
missions but may not have fit into a
larger campaign or a more holistic
framework. The new thinking, which
has been acute since 9/11 but was
actually happening before that, has
had us thinking about ‘SOF
campaigns.’ This was one of the
great things to come with the
Nunn-Cohen Act that created
USSOCOM [U.S. Special Operations
Command], where we really started
thinking about those SOF campaigns
and how we could take operations,
actions, and activities to create
some change in the environment, some
effect on the ground desired by the
national leadership of the JTF
[Joint Task Force] commander/warfighter
on the ground. How do we do that in
time and space in an operational
design/framework? So, as you look to
something like the anti-piracy
mission, it all begins with national
policy towards one, piracy, and two,
Somalia in this particular instance.
That becomes the initial guide.”
Based on that
initial guide and subsequent
refinement from national leadership,
a resulting SOF campaign plan would
allow the community “to use its own
skills and capabilities to help
achieve a network overmatch.
“As you look at
piracy or terrorism, we don’t look
at the straight individuals,” he
said. “We look at networks. And we
try to achieve network overmatch to
defeat these networks or at least
disrupt them to the greatest extent
possible, to where they are no
longer operationally relevant.”
He continued, “But
the other piece of that involves
population-based operations. So one
part is man-hunting as part of
network defeat/overmatch. But the
population piece is also integral
and critical. And our activities
going after the network can disrupt
that if we are too aggressive.”
SWCC
Community Future
“Within the SWCC community, we have
traditionally had this linkage
between the crews and the platforms
that they operate,” Veazie observed.
“But the fact is that we will have
less operational craft going into
the future. So we have developed the
Master Mariner Program, where we
basically train our guys to operate
civilian craft of up to 100 tons.
They get some deck seamen/merchant
marine-type licenses and
longshoreman-type union cards. They
learn how to sail craft. They learn
how to operate dhows – a ubiquitous
craft along the coast of Africa and
up into the Gulf region. They learn
how to operate a variety of craft.
“The program
provides us an ability to be ‘in the
environment’ while training our
operators to become master mariners
in every sense of what that means as
masters of the maritime
environment,” he said. “And, where
it may be suitable, those may be the
craft that they use to execute
special operations missions as
directed. It also allows them to
think critically and to think in a
different way than just being under
way aboard a very modern and
well-developed combatant craft. Now
they have to sort out how to solve
problems on a range of boats like
fishing trawlers, sailing vessels,
or other craft.”
|
|
|
 |
A Navy SEAL practices underwater
navigation during a diving exercise in Key West,
Fla., on Aug. 14, 2010. Navy SEALs take part in a
continuous training cycle to improve and further
specialize their skills. U.S. Navy photo by Mass
Communication Specialist 2nd Class William S. Parker |
“It’s been under way about four
to five years now,” he added. “It took us a
little time to get funding. We had to put the
framework of instructions and governing
documents into place. And we also had to find
out what qualifications were desirable and what
exactly we wanted to see from these guys in this
program. So it’s still emerging and continuing
to be defined. But that’s how it should be:
Driven by what warfighters in various theaters
around the world are looking for. We always try
to stay connected to that demand signal and
train and resource the force back here to be
employable and provide value to that warfighter.”
Asked about the broad future
vision for the NSW surface community, Veazie
acknowledged, “There is a little bit of thinking
on whether or not we should extend ourselves
past the maritime environment with guys who are
very good at certain skill sets. For example,
they are very good at operating vehicles; boats
right now but what’s to say they couldn’t
operate other platforms? They know heavy
weapons, because they mount them on their
special operations craft. So in places where the
density of SEALs, Special Forces, or even
Rangers may be stretched thinly across a broadly
distributed battle area, we could see the
potential for our
SWCC operators providing some kind of heavy
weapons support or to actually operating the
vehicles. We’re looking at that. We’ve done a
bit of that already. And it employs the natural
skill sets possessed by these operators.
“But we never want to forget
our maritime roots,” he said. “At the end of the
day, we are Naval Special Warfare. We are the
nation’s maritime special operations force. We
don’t want to get too far away from those
natural roots where we are the very best in the
world at mastering that environment.
“Some might see it as
rhetorical to say that our people are our No. 1
asset,” he concluded. “But I really believe
that. We can have the best machines in the world
but these guys are special operators in every
sense of the word. This is all they do from the
time they go through assessment and selection
training out in Coronado [Calif.] until the time
they are master chiefs or warrant officers. They
are the best in the business in our Navy and our
special operations forces. We take great pride
in that as we continue to develop these guys in
every way. So, as we go forward, we will see the
joint environment, the interagency environment,
and developing this terrific human capital that
can operate effectively in these environments
around the world.”
This article first
appeared in The Year
in Special Operations: 2011-2012 Edition.
|
|
|