|
Warship International Magazine
Number 2, 1974 Issue
Special Reprint of
First Generation SEAL Support Craft
by
Stephen L. Thomas
from
Boat Support Unit One
December 1968 - April 1971
OIC MST DaNang
May/Nov 1969
Apr/Oct 1970
| Once in Vietnam I
asked a SEAL officer just what, to his mind, constituted
the perfect SEAL operation. He replied that a
perfect operation was one wherein he and his men had
gotten into the target area, carried out their
mission, and then gotten back out again without
casualties. "And," he added, " I am
back in the Nha Be Officers' Club before Charlie
finds out I've ever been anywhere else. |
| Authors
Biography:
Stephen Thomas was born Charleston, SC, 30 January 1940. Attended Charleston public schools and flunked out of MIT in January 1958 after one
.... |
|
It is obvious from
this that stealth plays a vital part in SEAL team
operations. And necessarily so. Hostile forces in
the vicinity almost always outnumber the SEAL squad
or platoon assigned to a particular mission, so that
stealth, surprise, better training and superior equipment
are vital to the SEAL team.
|
One
of the two converted LCM-6 HSSC. Note the
armor protection abreast the engine room and
around the conning position. Note also the
cut-down ramp and duck-boarding, and the
shield and screens for the .50 cal. machine guns amidships. (USN photo) |
 |
Part of the stealth
surprise and equipment required for SEAL operations
in the Republic of Vietnam was provided by the men
of Mobile Support Team Two, whose specially configured boats provided transportation, fire
support and communications support for the SEALS,
and whose presence on occasion turned potential
disaster into tactical victory. This article is the
story of the first six of these specialized SEAL
support craft, of which it was once said that they
were the only boats to be seen on the rivers at
night, except for Viet Cong junks. Indeed, even the
Viet Cong felt great respect for the MST-2 boats.
Documents were captured in which VC units were
warned not to engage these boats when it was not
possible to do so at an advantage, unless taken
under fire first.
When it was first
decided to commit the SEALs to the struggle against
the Viet Cong and their North Vietnamese allies,
suitable boats to support the operations did not
exist, nor were the other means of insertion
available suitable for the half-land, half-water
environment of the Mekong Delta region. The
necessity for an undetected approach to the
objective area ruled out helicopters and existing
types of river patrol boats, while the few more or
less suitable small craft lacked one or more
essential qualities -- load carrying capacity,
endurance, ability to serve as heavy
weapons or communications platforms. Approach by
land was clearly ruled out in an area where roads,
if they exist, served merely to connect canals, and
can be considered as being under constant
surveillance by hostile forces or sympathizers. For
obvious reasons, insertion by parachute was out of
the question. Boats it had to be, and in Coronado,
in Little Creek and in Washington wheels began
to turn. Design studies were undertaken which
ultimately resulted in the highly successful LSSC
and MSSC, light and medium SEAL support craft
respectively. To meet immediate requirements it was
decided to convert existing naval boats, and to
purchase and modify suitable civilian small boats as
interim SEAL support craft.
At first, three
classed of boats were considered necessary: heavy
and medium units to act primarily as communications
and fire support platforms, to provide long-haul
mobility and to serve secondarily as
insertion/extraction craft; and light units to serve
as the primary insertion/extraction craft, and to
provide close-in fire support in emergency
situations. For the latter role a well-known
civilian runabout, the Boston whaler, was selected.
Its shallow draft, great speed and low silhouette
were to keep it in active service long after the
specially-designed LSSC arrived in Vietnam. It is
still a favorite for many types of operation.
|
106
mm. recoiless rifle on an LCM at Son-Ong-Doc,
January 1970. The object under canvas behind
the breech of the rifle is a minigun in the
forward gun tub (photo by author) |
 |
For the interim
heavy SEAL support craft the ubiquitous, reliable
LCM-6 was selected for conversion. Extensive is too
mild a word to describe the modifications made to
suit the two "Mike" boats for their new
mission. The engines were heavily muffled, and
exhaust gasses piped out below the waterline, while
the engine-room was thickly lined with soundproofing
material: at low speeds with everything in good
condition the boats could not be heard much more
than their own length away. The silhouette was
reduced by cutting down the duckboarding and
removing the characteristic open framework portion
of the bow ramp. The electrical system was beefed up
to handle a communications installation so complete
that the Mikes were frequently designated alternate
command posts for the bases from which they
operated. A Raytheon Pathfinder radar completed the
package, while a small refrigerator and a hot plate
provided minimal amenities on transits that could
run as long as 20 hours round trip.
|
60
mm. navy pattern mortar on the LCPL at Sea Float in January 1970. It is capable of
indirect fire in the trigger fire and drop
fire modes, and of direct fire in the trigger
fire mode only. It replaced the hand-held 60
mm. trigger fired trench mortar originally
carried. (Photo by author) |
 |
Armor projection
was applied lavishly. The ramp, well-deck,
engine-room and conning position were all protected
with armor that could stop a .50 cal. armor-piercing
round at a range of less than 100 meters, while the
engine-room and conning positions were further protected
with bar armor and trigger plates to defeat recoilless
rifle projectiles and anti-tank rockets. Overhead
protection was limited to the conning position and
the after two-thirds of the well-deck and consisted
of a single layer of splinter-proof plating
supported on pipe stanchions.
The armament of
these Mikes varied almost from day to day. Since
weapons were assigned not to the individual boat but
the the detachment operating it, there is no sure
way to tell what weapons a particular boat may have
mounted for any particular operation. This was
particularly true in the early days of their
service. The only permanently installed weapons were
the 106 mm. recoilless rifle mounted at the forward
end of the overhead splinter shield and the Navy
pattern 81 mm. mortar mounted in the well-deck just
forward of the 106. Initial outfit included four or
five .50 cal. machine guns and one or two old .30
cal. machine guns converted to fire the 7.62 mm. NATO standard round. In 1970, towards the
end of their lives, the two boats carried the
following weapons suits in addition to the big rifle
and the mortar:
| LCM
#1: |
- 2- .50
cal. MG in a tub between the rifle and the
mortar, superfiring over the latter
- 6- .50
cal. MG in broadside, 3 on each side
behind shields.
- 2-M_60
7.62 mm MG at the rear of the conning
positions to cover the stern arcs.
- 2-40 mm.
automatic grenade launchers useable in
various positions.
|
| LCM
#2: |
- 1- 7.62 mm
Minigun in the tub
- 4- .50
cal. MG in broadside.
- 1- .50
cal. MG covering the stern arcs
- 2- 40 mm.
automatic grenade launchers.
|
Even though LCM #2
carried four fewer weapons in total, she was greatly
superior in fighting value, thanks to the minigun,
which was to prove its worth on numerous occasions
in suppressing hostile fire.
Needless to say,
none of these additions and modifications did
anything to improve the performance of the basic LCM
configuration, modest enough to begin with. On one
occasion a 25-mile transit was accomplished in 10
hours, working against a four-to-five-knot current.
On occasions the overhead splinter shield was
pressed into service as a pick-up point for medical
evacuations helicopters, thus proving itself a
life-saver in more ways than one.
|
An
LCPL MK IV converted to interim MSSC,
photographed by the author at Sea Float in
January 1970. This boat has miniguns fore and
aft (note ammo boxes), with .50 cal. MG on
each beam and a 7.62 mm. MG on the starboard
beam. The 60mm. mortar is visible on its
pedestal between the minigun turrent and the
cabin. |
 |
Anyone familiar
with the workings of the average American sailor
mind can imagine for himself some of the nicknames
these two boats received on account of the long
rifle barrel projecting forward: no less colorful
were the epithets derived from a fancied resemblance
between the sound of a minigun burst and that of an
elephant breaking wind. At is said that no Viet Cong
who fired on either of these two Mike boats and
survived, was ever stupid enough to try it a second
time.
|
Another
view of the HSSC pictured on the title page of
this article. |
 |
The interim medium
SEAL support craft was a conversion from the
36-foot, steel-hulled LCPL Mark IV. Four boats were dispatched
in-country and won such high reputations for
reliability and ability to absorb damage that those
detachments equipped with them had to be ordered to
give them up after the replacements boats arrived
and were in service. The conversion was necessarily
less elaborate, owing to the smaller size and
single-screw power plant, but within the limitations
imposed by size and weight, modifications paralleled
those made to the larger LCMs. The engine noise
problem was considerably complicated by the presence
of two large 'engine access hatches, but a
satisfactory solution was found and the smaller
boats were even quieter than the LCMs. Quieter, that
is, as long as engines, hull and silencing systems
were kept in top condition. This was not always
possible at some of the advance bases from which
these boats operated, and it was often commented
that as the noise level rose, so did the weight of armament
carried.
Internal armor
protection was the same as that in the LCMs, and
covered the same areas, but the small size did not
permit fitting of the external bar armor and trigger
plates. The overhead splinter shield also could be
fitted, and several alternative protection expedients resulted
in varying degrees of success. Among the less unsuccessful were a sheet of 1/4 inch plywood covered
with sandbags, and a tarpaulin pitched like a tent,
hove so taut that a grenade striking it would either
roll or bounce off into the water.
The smaller size,
which limited the passenger and weapons load,
naturally meant that in the event of springing an
ambush the LCPL was far more vulnerable than the
LCM, with far less firepower available to shoot its
way out. However, with a far better
horsepower-to-weight ratio and a more efficient hull
form, the PL could usually (in practice,
always) turn downstream and run with the current.
Making 15 knots over the ground, the boat could get
out of the kill zone' before Charlie had time to
develop his full firepower and score a lethal hit.
As Viet Cong forces
were reinforced by North Vietnamese regular troops,
and their tactics became more sophisticated, and as
the boats got older, slower and noisier, the gun
packages grew heavier and heavier. The original
armament consisted of three .50 cal. MG in broadside
and after positions, with two .30 cal. MG converted
to 7.62 mm. in a countersunk tub forward. In the
cockpit was a sandbox emplacement for a 60 mm.
trigger-fired trench mortar. By the time they were
withdrawn from service and replaced by the
new-construction MSSC, every LCPL carried at least
one minigun and a new-pattern 60 mm. direct fire
mortar. The last of these LCPLs to withdrawn from
service carried two miniguns, the 60 mm. mortar, two
.50 cal. MG, one M-60 MG and a 40 mm. automatic
grenade launcher. Add to this the personal weapons of
the embarked SEALs firing over the bulwarks where
the cabin overhead was removed and you have one of
the most powerful concentrations of firepower ever
put into a small boat.
A number of other
weapons were tested on the LCPLs, including the 75
mm. and 57 mm. recoilless rifles, and various
combinations of aircraft rocket pods. Proving more
dangerous to the boat than to the enemy, they were
quietly forgotten.
The PLs were lucky:
there is no question about that. One, caught in an
ambush en-route to the objective area with SEALs
still embarked, took more than 200 holes in the
hull. Of the 13 men aboard, 12 were wounded, none
seriously. One hit, from a 57 mm. recoilless rifle,
passed completely through the hull, ripping open a
fuel tank, before exploding on the far bank. Despite
their damage and casualties, the SEAL and MST
personnel turned around and fought their way clear,
killing or wounding more than twice their own number
out of a hostile force estimated at company
strength, and at ranges of 25 meters and less.
The personnel of
Mobile Support Team TWO who manned these six boats
and their replacements, were members of Boat Support
Unit ONE, from Naval Amphibious Base, Coronado,
California. They were assigned to duty in Vietnam on
a 180 day temporary duty basis. MST and SEAL
personnel returned to Vietnam so frequently that
most of them spent more total time there than 95% of
the forces assigned on a permanent duty basis.
The full story of
SEAL and Mobile Support Team operations cannot yet
be told. The tactics and techniques are still too
potentially useful to risk disclosing them to
unfriendly powers. There is also the need to protect
our friends; many operations were made possible only
by the voluntary co-operation of Vietnamese
civilians, peasant farmers and fisherman, whose
lives would be forfeit if their actions were to
become known to the VC or the NVA.
Of the six boats
described above, none still exists. LCM #1 sank when
heavy seas pounded her against the tender to which
she had been assigned for overhaul. LCM #2 was found
to be so thoroughly worn out that repairs would have
come to more than the cost of replacement. Three of
the LCPLs were in a similar state, and wound up as
anonymous pieces of scrap on some Vietnamese junk
heap.
The fourth, in substantially
better condition, had been stripped and was lying
alongside a pier, awaiting transfer to the
Vietnamese Navy, when a carelessly-operated tug tore
her loose from her moorings. The empty, powerless
hull was seen to capsize just before drifting out of
sight around a bend, nevermore to be seen. There
are those of us, though, who look forward to hearing
any day now of a 'Flying Hoa-Ky' (American), running
the rivers of South Vietnam, raising hell and the
dead with its unmistakable stench of a diesel engine
long past due for overhaul.
|
A
minigun installation as found on the LCPL
based at Rach Soi in January 1970. In this
boat the minigun ammo box is located under the
forecastle deck, rather than above and behind
the turret. The pedestal and recoil cylinder
of the mortar are visible behind the gunner's
head. (Author's photo) |
 |
It will never
redound to the U.S. Navy's credit that the (then)
most powerful navy in the world had to resort to
such makeshifts to carry out a mission , but it will
always be a source of pride that sailors did so much
with such jury-rigged tools. Until now these first
six SEAL support craft have been almost completely
unknown outside the special warfare community, and
even there they are slowly being forgotten--the
Mobile Support Team has been disbanded, its
personnel scattered and for the most part
discharged, and the SEALs are busy training for
other missions they hope will never have to be
carried out. Still, the six old warriors were the
first in a new family of specialized riverine and
estuarine warfare craft, and they deserve to be
remembered, if for no other reason than that.
|